‘Hybrid’ or Mixed Strategy to Patents and Confidential Information

It is possible for companies to use hybrid strategies by combining both forms of IP. For example, companies might choose to keep certain aspects of their product or processes secret and rely on confidential information/trade secret protection. They may also simultaneously file patents in respect of other aspects of the same product or process.

EXAMPLE

acme

ACME Inc. produces biofuels from carbon based materials. The process of creating the biofuels is achieved through the use of a bioreactor and certain microorganisms.

The company filed for patents in the United States, the EU and Japan over the bioreactor in 2005. However, it also relied on confidential information/trade secret protection to protect the identity of the microorganisms, an element that was not essential for the validity of the patent for the bioreactor. ACME Inc. waited until 2008 to file for patents on the microorganism, thereby prolonging its monopoly over the microorganisms for a period of time that was three years longer than the twenty year patent term. Through this hybrid strategy, ACME Inc. derived a competitive advantage over its competitors who would be able to manufacture the bioreactor in 2025 but would not be able to use the specific microorganisms to complete the biofuels process until 2028. 

Although ACME Inc. might have been able to preserve its confidential information/trade secret protection over the microorganisms indefinitely, it obviously thought it a better strategy to eventually obtain a patent, even if this resulted in the disclosure of the secret.

Last modified: Thursday, 5 October 2017, 10:40 AM