Lesson 5: Who Needs an IP Strategy?

An IP Strategy is Relevant to all Businesses and All Industries

A common misperception is that an IP strategy is not relevant to all businesses and is really only vital to businesses operating in certain spheres like technology and pharmaceuticals. In fact, adopting a considered IP strategy is now becoming more commonplace and necessary in a wide variety of industråçies and businesses.

In the entertainment sector, for example, the use of different forms of IP to strategic advantage has become increasingly important.



One specific example of this is the approach adopted by the internationally renowned U.S pop singer and song writer, Taylor Swift, whom Forbes Magazine has listed as one of the most influential women in the world.

Taylor Swift has cast a wide net in terms of trying to maximize her return on her various IP assets.


  1. In addition to relying on copyright protection, the most common form of protection for musical works, Taylor Swift uses trademark law to protect her name “Taylor Swift” and some of the titles and lyrics of her popular songs.

  2. In October of 2014, Taylor Swift filed a number of trademark applications in the U.S for specific song titles and words or phrases from some of her songs used in association with a number of goods and services.

    The intent of these trademark applications is to capitalize on the sale of her merchandise in consumer markets and to deter possible infringement of her lyrics and song titles on third party consumer merchandise.

    Because song titles are not generally protected by copyright law, she turned to another form of IP namely, trademarks, to offer a different kind of protection.

    So long as the trademarked titles are used in association with the products and services for which they are registered, Taylor Swift will be able to stop competitors from using the same words in association with the same or confusingly similar products and services. The song titles will remain associated with her.

  3. Taylor Swift has not only moved to protect her trademarks in the United States and other Western countries, she has registered her name as a trademark in China in association with a variety of products and services.

    In an effort to stop competitors from selling knock-off products under her name, she has also launched a clothing line targeted specifically to Chinese consumers. She is using an “authentication feature” which will allow customers to verify online whether they have purchased an authentic Taylor Swift product, as opposed to a knock-off.

    However, there are at least three other registrations of her name in China that she does not own. Because China registers trademarks based on the first to file rather than the first to use, competitors have monopolized her name in association with specific products, such as bathing suits. What this means from a practical perspective is that despite being proactive in protecting her trademark rights, Taylor Swift still can’t capitalize fully on her brand. For example, she cannot sell bathing suits under her name in China.


Song titles for which she has sought trademark protection include:

  • “Party like it’s 1989”, for use on retail services, on-line retail services, computerized online ordering, promotional services, providing consumer information and facilitating the exchange of information.
  • “Cause We Never Go Out of Style”, for use on paper products, printed products, printed publications, stationary, temporary and removable tattoos, art supplies and writing instruments.
Last modified: Thursday, 14 September 2017, 10:20 AM